Uncategorized

Cuz dinosaurs make everything better.
byu/WarnerToddHuston inHouse_of_Svengoolie

Hello, Svengoolie fans. Tonight Sven and MeTV will present the kaiju kalamities of “Godzilla: King of the Monsters.” Who is ready??
byu/WarnerToddHuston inHouse_of_Svengoolie

Renfield comes to his end…
byu/WarnerToddHuston insvengoolie

-By Warner Todd Huston

It has been 60 years since the plane carrying rock stars Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, and Jiles Perry “The Big Bopper” Richardson crashed into an Iowa cornfield on Feb. 3, 1959. It was memorialized as “The day the music died,” but the story has been a life-long event that haunted the world of the Big Bopper’s son, a boy who never met his famous father. But that total estrangement ended 50 years after the crash when that meeting finally took place in a strange but beautiful way.

The boy who was born two months after his famous father died in a tragic plane crash on the “Day The Music Died,” saw his father’s face for the first time, fifty years after the fatal day that stole the elder from our world.

How is this, you ask? This all may seem like one of those riddles or some exercise in logic but, no, I assure you it’s quite a true story. And the truth of the matter makes for a fascinating, if unlikely, story.

Jay Perry Richardson was born the same year his father died in a plane accident that was mourned around the world. In fact, Jay was still peacefully floating in his mother’s womb when that fatal day in 1959 came to take the life of his vital and well-known father. Young Jay never laughed with his father, never touched his dad’s face, never learned to ride a bike by his dad’s side and were it not for the heavily thumbed and faded photographs his family all so cherished, young Jay wouldn’t even know what his father looked like.

Unless… unless he looked in the mirror. Yes, that face he wore, he has been told, is the spitting image of his father’s. The thought likely always warmed Jay’s heart.

He may not have known his father in person, but Jay was always fascinated by his father’s legacy and felt close to him despite the distance between them. Jay spent those fifty years of his life studying his father, talking to the many admirers who knew him, writing of him, and traveling the country to keep his father’s memory alive. Even emulating what he knew of the man whose hand he never held, a man with whom he was never able to toss around a football, a man who missed being able to beam with pride at the many successes of a boy he would never know.
Continue reading “50 Years After ‘The Day The Music Died,’ A Boy Finally Met His Long, Lost Father”

-By Gary Krasner

This is classic: Death By Entitlement.

But I’m not going to rag on these two people who met with a tragic end. The author correctly assesses why they died. Even some NY Times readers had it right.

Besides, the virtuous and laudatory beliefs of youth don’t deserve to be denigrated, even if one of those beliefs led to their demise.

However, this story has a very powerful message about how one’s belief systems, that lack evidence, can be dangerous for you.

Liberal ideology, for example, teaches that young blacks males are as non-violent as any other race. But inconvenient data says otherwise. Believe the data and act accordingly. Jesse Jackson does!

It’s not necessarily about liberals. I warn my friend, for example, to be cautious as he travels all over the world. He’s conservative.

But it is their blog entries about their travels and beliefs that provides a marvelous window for us to see how and why this ended tragically.

As the cliche goes, we’ve seen this movie before.
Continue reading “

Death by Entitlement”

-By Gary Krasner

In a company conference call, John Schnatter uttered the word “nigger” in a “role-playing exercise to prevent future public-relations disasters” for the company.

But the “role-playing exercise to prevent future public-relations disasters” created a public-relations disaster.

Liberal insanity still prevails.

EXHIBIT A: Recall, Detective Mark Fuhrman was crucified on the witness stand for using that word. But liberal attorney Marcia Clark was too afraid to rehabilitate her witness by allowing Fuhrman to explain that he used that word in an audition, merely to sell his script to a movie producer.

Instead — like the cowardly, hair-brained liberal she was — Clark distanced herself from Furman and that politically incorrect word, thereby leading to OJ’s not guilty verdict.

EXHIBIT B:Recall comedian Andrew Dice Clay’s premier about 20 years ago, role-playing on stage as a brash, misogynistic, goombah. His use of vulgar words and epithets of women, gays, and minorities was intended to showcase the character’s bigotry and ignorance — to laugh AT HIM. But the silly libs and MSM destroyed him in that politically correct era.

The 1970s was a more enlightened time. Carol O’Conner played a similar character in the TV series, All in the Family. He was nominated for 9 Emmy Awards for lead actor, and won 5 times. Unlike Clay, no one accused O’Conner of being an ignorant bigot.

Fool Me 114 Times
-By Gary Krasner

I learned of a new level of click bait tonight.

I received an advertisement in my PJmedia email news feed.

it read:

“Remember Catherine Bell from Jag”
“Wait till you see where she is now”

I never saw an episode of Jag. But I had a collection of bare-breasted pics of Bell, thanks to Google — a valuable research tool.

Since I appreciated her breasts, I was curious where they were now, as the advertisement promised.

So I clicked on the ad and landed on this webpage… WARNING, don’t feel obligated to click!
Continue reading “

Fool Me 114 Times”

-By Gary Krasner

Sen. Camila Harris, the black female hope for president, and shameless demagogue if there ever was one, kept asking that question.

Gina Haspel SHOULD have said the following.

QUOTE:

Senator, it was neither moral nor immoral. It was considered NECESSARY, and at the time, LEGAL, by the DoJ’s Office of Legal Counsel.

Nations in crisis may have to do what is necessary, and that might be considered immoral, especially absent of mitigation. But there was mitigation—-the imperative to protect Americans.

The countervailing element was to save lives. Killing is immoral. Killing someone in self defense or to defend someone is moral.

Sen. Harris, you support extinguishing the life of an innocent baby. You voted for partial birth abortion. Your countervailing consideration is the convenience of the mother. Is abortion moral—yes of no?

Moreover, we tortured no one. waterboarding the way we do it is merely a discomfort, according to OLC. We do it to our own military as training for interrogation. But the way waterboarding has been done by evil regimes is absolutely considered torture by Geneva conventions, and the reason many Japanese military leaders were prosecuted as war criminals.

So taken in context, for a nation, “morality” is not always dispositive. But NECESSITY is always the prime consideration, and it’s often justified.

UNQUOTE

We need to have an adult conversation about this issue, and Democrats must stop the petty demagoguery and hypocrisy.

-By Gary Krasner

I can’t agree with this article (short excerpt below). There IS such a thing as being totally straight. And space-age technology proved that I was.

Four years ago Progressive Insurance offered subscribers a chance to reduce their premiums significantly. I jumped at the offer!

All I had to do was plug in a device into my car’s computer connection. It would transmit data to the company analyzing my driving habits.

Basically, you have to demonstrate that you drive like a faggot. You can’t drive fast or brake suddenly. Shit like that.

After 6 months of data stored, I received a notice saying I failed to get the discount. I called Progressive to find out why.

Progressive Insurance is founded by a hard left commie. So I made sure to watch my language, and not sound politically incorrect.

The bitch on the phone explained that the data showed that I didn’t drive safely. She told me how to display the results on their website.

Then she pointed out the dates where I braked hard, for example. I countered that most often, the speed indicated I was going only 10 MPH at the time!

None of my complaints mattered. She gave me enough details on the ways the computer assesses driving if I wanted to try it again.
Continue reading “

Certifiably Straight”

-By Gary Krasner

Chek out “The Dangers of America’s Obsession with Inequality.” That’s the title of Michael Tanner’s much too short essay.

It prompted me to add my thoughts to it and some more detail to what he’s saying because class warfare is still the prime political strategy for Democrats. Resentment of the wealthy is a great motivator during hard times. It is one reason Obama ran the economy into an 8-year-long business recession. All for political gain. Even lefty economists, like Krugman of course, got with the program, claiming that the eras of greater than 2 percent growth were over.

As soon as he got into office Trump disabused them of that idea. We now have over 3 percent growth, which Obama never achieved a single time in 8 years. Then following his tax cut in January, the Fed collected more revenue than any other month in the last 30 years.

ALSO SEE: CNSNews.com: Feds Collect Record Taxes in First Month Under Tax Cut; Run Surplus in January

Which brings us to the inequality theme which Dems (pardon the phrase), are banking on in November.

In 1996, I asked my boss why my friend Sally was earning more than I was. He showed me the job printouts. He said, “See, she works faster and makes fewer mistakes. Mistakes are costly”

I worked in the printing industry and back then Imagesetter film WAS costly This was before computer-aided typesetting and digital printing presses were widespread. I got his point. But liberals ignore it, because “income inequality” is the new name for the old Marxist phrase, “to each according to his needs.”

If liberals get their way on “equal pay for equal work”, then workers like Sally will earn less, but it will be equal to their less talented cohorts. How does that help women?!
Continue reading “

The Importance of Income Inequality”

-By Gary Krasner

I’m sick of the liberal media interviewing little kids about the latest shooting in Florida, as if kids have the solution to shootings.

It’s really a cheap way the elicit emotion and anger at legal gun ownership.

I spoke to one 6 year-old from the school who won’t be fodder for those child predators:

Gary: You must be very sad today.

Joey (6 year-old): Yes, my friend was shot by a bad man.

Gary: How did that happen?

Joey (6 year-old): My mommy said it’s because there are too many people with guns.

Gary: More people die from car crashes than guns. So should we outlaw cars, or the wheel – just to be extra safe?

Joey (6 year-old): I don’t know.

Gary: Well, let me ask you this. Do you like ice cream?

Joey (6 year-old): YES!

Gary: And when your little brother always spills it on his shirt, what does your mommy do?

Joey (6 year-old): She yells at him and takes the bowl away from him.

Gary: And what does your mommy say about guns?

Joey (6 year-old): She says guns should be taken away from everyone.

Gary: So then maybe we should take away ice cream from everyone too? That way, no one can spill it, including your brother.

Joey (6 year-old): NO!!! I should have ice cream because I don’t spill it!

Gary: Hmm, I see. So only responsible people like you should have ice cream?

Joey (6 year-old): Yes! I’m responsible!

Gary: And so maybe responsible, law-abiding citizens should keep their guns too?

Joey (6 year-old): (pondering . . . ) Yes!

Gary: So what would you say to your mommy now?

Joey (6 year-old): Bitch, keep your dirty liberal hands off my ice cream! And my gun too, when I’m old enough to have one.

Gary: You’re a smart little kid, Joey.

-By Gary Krasner

Oh, what a beautiful mornin’,
Oh, what a beautiful day.
I got a beautiful feelin’
Ev’rything’s goin’ my way.

I’m sorry about that. I’ve been breaking out in song and dance all day.

If people saw me on the street today, they would wonder why that faggot was singing and dancing.

Let me tell you why: ALL THE DOMINOS ARE FALLING!!!!!

All the liberals I hate are dropping through a trap door on a daily basis. Poetically, a trap door that THEY carefully constructed for Trump, Fox News, and Roy Moore.

There’s a bright golden haze on the meadow
There’s a bright golden haze on the meadow
The corn is as high as an elephant’s eye,
An’ it looks like it’s climbin’ clear up to the sky.

Sorry again. I can’t contain myself. Is this what it’s like to be gay?! I was never that crazy about Broadway show tunes until now!

The liberal media ICONS are toppling. NBC fired Matt Lauer today. He was the biggest apologist for Dems, and one of the most shamelessly biased one.
Continue reading “

I’m floating on air (lyrics by Freddie Cosmo)”

-By Gary Krasner

After reading slimy stories about Weinstein, Franken, Rose, et. al., I believe the take-away is that a man must respect a woman’s dignity!

And that means that men must, ASK BEFORE YOU GRAB! “ABYG” must be taught is grade school, along with “Just say no to drugs.”

I don’t want to get into the weeds of this policy. But since no one else has, I guess it’s up to me. And language is important. For example:

Wrong: “Hey Miss Jones, can I grab your ass?”
Right: “Pardon me, Ms. Jones, may I have the great pleasure of fondling your buttocks?”

See that you’re careful to avoid vulgar terms. Stick to the safe ones, like penis, breasts, and buttocks. You want to avoid creating a hostile work environment or make a woman feel like a slut — unless it’s a time when she wants to be treated like a slut. Always ask first!

And one must never ASSUME that a woman would want to see your penis. You just don’t know unless you ask. But politely!

Wrong: “Hey Miss Jones, what do you think of THIS. Ehh?! (Canadian version)”
Right: “Excuse me Ms. Jones, I was just wondering whether or not you might wish to view my penis?

And add, “and would you prefer it flaccid or erect?” And also, “Do you want fries with that?” In other words, provide her with options. Because when it comes to women’s empowerment, you want to be part of the solution; not part of the problem!

Remember, it’s about RESPECT!

(You found this distasteful? I’ll quote Franken, “it was just a joke!”)

-By Gary Krasner

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said it was terrorism (Duh. thank you for clearing that up!) and “a particularly cowardly act.”

We don’t need his commentary on the act! We need him to resume surveillance of mosques when leads on possible terror lead to those mosques.

But cowardly?! Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov is a devout Muslim who obeyed the mandates of the Koran and sharia law–which is integrated into Islam as its political commandments.

Attention David: 8 killed without a gun. Most since 911 for NYC. Maybe we should outlaw truck rentals!!!?

Uzbekistan immigrant. Diversity visa lottery program. IRRELEVANT. He was committed to sharia. Bar islamists from the US (and nazis and commies. No difference) regardless of nation of origin.

PBS is pushing again the apologists’ anthem that defend Islam:

Self radicalized – as if that means it’s not a serious threat. When you can recruit an army of murderers by merely presenting an ideology, that’s a serious threat.

Lone wolf – as if that means lone crazy killer. Wrong. He works alone to remain undetected. You don’t need “material support” to kill people! He’s united by the ideology! That’s all soldiers of Islam need.

Muslims have “Muslim Insurance.” That’s the insurance protection that Muslims receive when liberals label Saipov a “radical Muslim extremist.”
Continue reading “

Same Old, Same Old, Terrorism”

-By Gary Krasner

Last evening, during the Oct 10th broadcast of the PBS News Hour, a devastating attack occurred on the mindset and sensibilities of the correspondents and production staff at the network.

According to reports, a balding, gray-haired man in a business suit wandered past security and into the studio during the segment on Trump’s announcement to roll back Obama’s EPA plan to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

The viewers first saw PBS correspondent John Yang interview Gina McCarthy, Obama’s EPS Commissioner, who was critical of Trump’s plan. This was normal PBS procedure.

But then the crisis became apparent when Yang introduced someone with the opposing view. On occasion, the program will air counterpoint, just enough to show that they’re unbiased.

But when they do, the supposed opposing view is some moderate Republican who often ends up agreeing with his opponent on some of the issues, and then ends up being critical of the Republican president. Some of the more squishy such Republicans appear as regulars. Nothing is left to chance.

Except last night, apparently. Because John Yang next introduced Bob Murray, of the Murray Energy Corporation, for the counterpoint, unaware that Murray is a real conservative.

Murray discussed the merits of coal and fossil fuels generally, including it’s much lower cost for budget strapped consumers.

But it wasn’t until Murray posited scientific challenges to global warming did the staff become alarmed, as it was information that’s been carefully excluded from the program previous to Murray’s slot on the show.

According to reports, regular viewers of the program called to complain. Some of the staff at the News Hour were provided with psychological counseling to deal with the trauma.
Continue reading “

Video: PBS News Hour Victim of Violent, Senseless Attack”

-By Gary Krasner

Every Democrat allegation since their horribly shocking night of Nov 8 was designed to undermine the Donald J. Trump administration and slow his conservative agenda.

The Saul Alinsky method of constant personal (as opposed to policy) attacks is clearly evident. Assigning defamatory labels (again, instead of arguing policy), for example.

During the campaign, Trump supposedly engendered Hillary’s list of horribles: misogyny, islamophobia, xenophobia, homophobia, racism, and an evil greedy capitalist one percenter.

Also during the campaign, Obama was busy using the national security apparatus and FISA courts to spy on Trump campaign, associates, and supporters.

Trump seemed uncritical of Putin, and his associates had (legal!) business ventures in Russia or with Russians, so that was to be the pretext to make it look proper and justified.

After the election, the illegal surveillance would have been exposed by a President Trump, so the pretext of national security had to be rushed on stage.
Continue reading “

Hell Hath No Fury Like A Democrat Party Scorned”

-By Gary Krasner

On CNN’s State of the Union, with Dana Bash, on May 28, 2017, the topic of Sanctuary Cities was discussed with Sanctuary City Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago.

The definition of a “sanctuary city” is one which allows illegal aliens to reside within its jurisdiction, flouting state and federal immigration laws. And the operative word is “illegal.”

But, the word “immigration” was spoken 8 times, without the prefix “illegal”. “Immigrant” was used spoken 4 times, with the prefix “illegal” zero times, but “undocumented” used only once.

For example, Dana introduced the mayor this way:

“Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is bucking the president’s new orders and he has launched a new ad campaign promising the Windy City will continue to welcome immigrants.”

See? Sanctuary cities are defined as welcoming ILLEGAL immigrants. Welcoming immigrants is what every city does!

Later, Mayor Emanuel said:
Continue reading “

Political Bias or Sloppiness?”

-By Gary Krasner

From the outset, the Weiner affair has been pulsating and throbbing (no pun intended) with tabloid news excitement.

Previously separated, now Weiner is cut off (no pun intended) by Huma.

Huma dumped the pedophile Democrat and onetime favorite for mayor of “sin city” NYC.

Hours after he was sentenced, Huma reportedly said “enough”, after the pounding (no pun intended) she received in the media from the scandal.

Political observers agreed with her move, noting that there’s only so much one woman can swallow. (no pun intended)

Now, as a registered sex offender, and a registered Democrat, he’s a shoe-in for the Democrat nomination.

There was no doubt about his popularity, possessing a fully engorged (no pun intended) personality, and being a member (no pun intended) of the hard left (no pun intended).

But pedophile support now appears flaccid (no pun intended), after Weiner announced that sex with under-aged kids is a sickness.

News about Weiner first re-emerged last year, when it protruded (no pun intended) into the Hillary email scandal.

But today, with news of his conviction and two-year prison sentence, the Weiner affair is once again glistening and dripping with aroused media excitement. (no pun intended).

While serving his sentence, Weiner will be probed (no pun intended) by federal investigators for having classified docs on his laptop.

-By Cernan Cabriesy

Plagued by decades of technical, funding, over budget, and PR problems, NASA is planning to make a major announcement today, Wednesday February 22nd. Rumor has it they found aliens on other planets.

That is, of course, bunk.

NASA never fully recovered after the Apollo program. To be fair, it hasn’t always been NASA’s fault. The agency is constantly the victim of politics.Yet they managed to struggle their way through the shuttle program, the International Space Station, and many different science projects including telescopes, and probes – every one of them costing millions more than budgeted due to technical errors, and accidents.

Currently the Juno probe is having engine trouble and is indefinitely stuck in orbit around Jupiter and their heavy-lift rocket motor is plagued with problems,

Worse yet, the agency has become another tentacle in the Democrat agenda in attempts to make the case of global warming.

But there may be a ray of sunshine in all this darkness. Congress just voted to defund NASA’s Global Warming budget. The purpose of this is to redirect funds back toward human exploration of space. It will be interesting to see if this announcement is the last gasp of dying liberal ideas or if this is truly a refocus on the types of missions that made us applaud NASA’s endeavors.

The sooner the agency is divorced from Liberal politics and returns to its primary mission, the better.

-By Gary Krasner

Another Sunday and another failure of Trump’s surrogates to correctly frame Trump’s gaffs and misspeak.

The media is going gaga over what they are characterizing as Trump’s saying that the U.S.A. is just like a murderous Vladimir Putin.

The administration sent Vice President Mike Pence out to set the record straight on the Sunday morning shows (e.g. Meet the Press, Face the Nation). And as usual, Pence drowned in his own words when he tried to spin it on TV.

Pence’s poor performance will be online soon, so you can see it yourself, but here is how my “imaginary competent Pence” would have responded:

MSM Liberal Host: So was Pres. Trump using moral equivalence.

Imaginary Competent Pence: Absolutely not. O’Reilly said “Putin is a killer”. He wasn’t suggesting that Putin PERSONALLY killed people. Rather, he could only have meant that as a head of state, Putin ORDERED the killing of people by way of agents of the government. That’s the only context one can interpret O’Reilly’s comment.

And consequently, the president’s answer was correct. Sovereign nations can and do kill people! Armed conflict is occurring each day in the mideast. Last week, President Trump ordered the killing of al Qaeda leaders in a raid in Yemen. President Obama ordered hundreds of drone assassinations. Would you say Obama “was a killer”?

So it was O’Reilly who misspoke. He said “killer” when he meant to say “murderer.”

There! Was that so damn hard, Mr. Pence?!

For reference:

O’Reilly: Putin is a “Killer”; Trump: “What, Do You Think Our Country’s So Innocent?”
By Ken Meyer | 7:16 pm, February 4th, 2017

-By Warner Todd Huston

For years liberals, and even some on the right, claimed that George W. Bush caused more evil jihadists to join al Qaeda with his quick and strong response to the 9/11 attacks in 2001. But now the mastermind behind those attacks is admitting that W’s response to that terrible day is exactly what put a quick end to al Qaeda’s plans for further attacks and W wrecked mayhem among the terror group’s networks.

These revelations have at last leaked out from among the interviews Khalid Sheik Mohammed — often known as KSM — gave to the CIA in the months and years after the brutal terror attacks in 2001. Mohammad was an evil mastermind and one of the key al Qaeda operatives who planned and executed the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Towers as well as the attack that sent United Airlines Flight 93 crashing into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001. The attacks killed over 3,000 Americans in only a few hours on that terrible day.

The new information comes from a new book by CIA operative James E. Mitchell whose new memoir details some of the testimony given by the terrorist. The book, entitled, “Enhanced Interrogation: Inside the Minds and Motives of the Islamic Terrorists Trying To Destroy America,” details the CIA’s trials under fire and the interrogation program Mitchell helped design during George W. Bush’s first term in office as his administration struggled to deal with the massive and unprecedented threat of al Qaeda after 9/11.

In the book Mitchell relates how happily Mohammed bragged about personally murdering Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl and how he even “preened” while describing his horrible deed. Mohammad even laughed that severing Pearl’s head was “Just like slaughtering sheep.”
Continue reading “

Liberals Wrong Again: It Was G.W. Bush Who Stopped Al Qaeda’s Second Major U.S. Attack”

-By Gary Krasner

Of course, with that title I refer to none other than Don Trump.

Hillary had 2 horrible weeks. So bad, that Trump could have been up 10 points by now, if he had just shut his blasted mouth.

But no, the narcissist can’t shut up. He must draw attention to himself. And he can’t deliver a scripted speech. Boy, is that secret out now.

His scripted speeches are delivered in monotone, as if he were a 6 year old reading something out loud. At least now I know why he eschews reading a teleprompter. He knows he’s bad.

But does he know that he can’t explain crap? I mean anything! Does he even know he’s blowing up his campaign?

n eExample was the very first speech announcing his candidacy. All he had to say was, “no, of course I didn’t mean that all Mexicans are killers and rapists.”

And when you understand his inability to explain, or to backtrack from a comment he has made, you understand what happened today:

Trump: “Obama and Hillary founded ISIS.”
Continue reading “

The LOOO-HOO-HOO-SER”

-By Gary Krasner

Trump misses many opportunities. I wrote about that theme a year ago, and I’m still writing about it.

As Barry Farber used to say, you most decisively destroy an enemy when you destroy it’s aircraft before it gets off the ground.

What does that mean? It means that you PREVENT an enemy’s asset from doing damage to you. You do not wait for the threat to become activated.

When you don’t wait to react to something, it’s called “preemption.” Trump merely reacted, without substance, with a mundane tweet about Hillary’s cliches.

Trump failed to prevent what Rush Limbaugh said in his opening sentence today: “Everybody knew it was coming.”

I’ll give you an example. Chelsea Clinton introduced her mom at the convention Thursday. It was a well delivered speech, and as Rush said, we knew what she would say.

Whatever she was going to say, the best way to derail it would have been to ask Chelsea questions BEFORE she delivers the speech. WHY?

Because then the media and public will be focussed on those questions! The buzz will be, “will she address it?” What if she fails to address it?

If Chelsea failed to address a legitimate question in her speech, when the media focus is on her, then the conclusion will be that the allegation has merit.
Continue reading “

The Costly Access to the Clintons”

-By Gary Krasner

I was doing work in the house, so I had to listen to my radio, instead of internet radio. That meant I had two choices.

After Sean Hannity’s stupidity made me ill, I switched to Mike Savage. A book-smart guy (in some areas), but an egotist who’s very arrogant and rude to listeners who call his show. But Savage can be as stupid as Hannity:

Stupid Comment #1:

Mike Savage said that the German shootings today could be a false flag operation, by German neo-Nazis, in order to cast blame on Muslims. Although he said he doubted it.

Stupid because (1) a false flag operation, with the intention of making it appear that Muslims did the killing, is wholly unnecessary when Muslims are committing mass killings on their own, on an hourly basis!! And stupid because (2) German neo-Nazis are atheists who see no advantage to going on suicidal shooting sprees, and have not been randomly killing women and children. Only Muslims and crazy people have.

Stupid Comment #2:
Continue reading “

Michael Savage: Stupid and Arrogant”